Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
-A SPECIAL REPORT-
-About water, power, food and the environmental movement-
A pro-dam perspective by Doug
Doug is an independent environmental
research analyst specializing in aspects of
AMERICA WAKE UP!!!
You are under attack……. and you don’t even know it! When an enemy attacks a country in a war, almost always the country’s dams are targeted. Why? Because dams provide the basis to life and the enemies objective is to kill that life. Today almost all of our dams across the country are under a physical attack or a preemptive smear attack through propaganda. There are HUNDREDS of coalitions within and without our country that are working to have THOUSANDS of our dams destroyed. Don’t believe it? Do a Internet search. Type in the words “remove dam.” You’ll see page after page of environmental organizations come up. They claim that they want the dams removed in the name helping or saving a disturbed plant or animal or ecological system. But is this the only reason they are doing this? Or is there more to it?
Consider what some have said
Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about? -- Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 UNESCO Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro
This expansionist, no-limits-to-growth paradigm has resulted in global environmental deterioration and diminished quality of life for everyone. It is the root cause of social, political and economic instability and insecurity ……. All of the over-populated countries in the world, including the United States of America, need to implement programs for gradual population reduction over the next 20, 50, 100 and 200 years. The environmental, economic, political and social benefits will be incalculable. Of course, population reduction is only one ingredient of the new paradigm. Excerpts from: http://www.1worldcommunication.org/damisinformation.htm
"If you ask me, it'd be a little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we would do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that are adequate for our needs, but that won't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to the earth or to each other." Amory Lovins in The Mother Earth - Plowboy Interview, Nov/Dec 1977, p. 22
"The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these third world countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don't suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them." -- Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
…….."My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness with it's full complement of species returning throughout the world." -- David Foreman
"…It is not enough to oppose the construction of new dams. It is time to free our shackled rivers and tear down Hetch Hetchy, Glen Canyon, New Melones, Tellico and other concrete monstrosities." Excerpts from Earth First! News.
We have wished, we ecofreaks, for a disaster or for a social change to come and bomb us into Stone Age, where we might live like Indians in our valley, with our localism, our appropriate technology, our gardens, our homemade religion ….guilt-free at last! Stewart Brand (Whole Earth Catalogue)
One American burdens the earth much
more than twenty Bangladeshis... This is
a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize
world populations, we must eliminate
350,000 people per day. It is a horrible
thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say
Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, 1991
See this extremely
important online Power Point presentation:
"It happened that a fire broke out
backstage in a theatre. The clown came out to
inform the public. They thought it was just a jest
and applauded. He repeated his warning, but they
shouted even louder. So I think the world will
come to an end amid general applause from all the
wits, who believe that it is a joke."
We can’t live without our dams!
Dams provide us with lakes, teaming with fish,
they store water so we can grow food and have it
on our tap in our houses. Many farms cannot exist
without them, and in turn the farms, at times,
quite often feed in excess of 50% of the
wildlife. They supply our rivers with water in
times of drought. They charge our aqua filters
and provide life to wetlands. Currently
hydroelectric dams produce our most efficient,
low-cost, abundant, clean, sustainable, renewable
energy we can obtain. While the rest of the world
is advancing by building more hydropower plants,
we are working on ways to take our dams out. With
this, while the rest of the world works to
continue to advance, we work to digress.
Don’t fall for the brainwashing
Dam removal IS BIG BUSINESS
Fish, especially salmon, are normally the number one ploy tactic used to breach dams worldwide. Thus, in my opinion, will prove to put millions of people out of work, wreck economies, reduce food, water and energy where these movements are allowed to go unchecked. With this, there are plenty of indicators showing that salmon and their numbers are intentionally being killed or kept from spawning in order to keep populations down to keep the false environmental money making machine rolling. This is also one of the reasons predator species are now being allowed to flourish. It is a FACT that salmon science and statistics are quite often manipulated to produce a bias outcome. The spotted owl is being used as a red herring dressed in a salmon suit. That is, salmon are being used against dams the same way the spotted owl was being used against the timber industry. It was a ploy and “everybody knows it!”
Why do some people want the dams out?
3) LAND CONFISCATION. Another
reason for breaching dams is land confiscation.
This highly illicit tactic has been going on for a
while in this country. Recently it has been
getting worse because no one (very rarely) has
anyone had the knowledge or power to challenge
these bully organizations so they keep on the
4) DESTROY the U.S. There are subversives working for the destruction of the nation. One of their sole tenants was to spread the ideas of current-day America being based on ideologies of evil. To indoctrinate our own culture they have twisted many of our concepts, highlighted the bad side of our history and omitted many of the good aspects. Today, with the help of our public schools, this bias of thinking has become common place. Thus today we have many of our own people actively working for the over throw of the nation they never truly came to know.
5) It’s the RIGHT THING. Infrequently –very infrequently- removing a dam is the right thing to do for environmental or defective dam reasons. However, definitely NOT for as many reasons as false environmentalist would attempt to have you believe.
Making it Personal
“Do I really know enough about this issue to be
advocating to having a dam destroyed?”
Here’s how to tell if dam removal is justified:
If I act as an advocate to have a dam(s) removed how would it actually impact and justify destroying a pre-established functioning ecosystem? How about the damage that it would inflict on the local communities? Would it justify how it would effect: flood control, hydro power, farm irrigation, water tables and aqua filters, erosion control, recreation, fire fighting, fishing, fish hatcheries, barge shipping, wet lands, wildlife habitat, species and endangered species, uncontrollable water supplies and temperatures, jobs, economy, emergency water supplies, river water moderation, boating, tourism? Is it worth while to wreck havoc on all of these points to conduct an experiment to see if we can [supposedly] maintain a certain amount of plants or animals?
During the Klamath basin crisis, not only were the farmers hurt but there were 489 species of animals placed at risk during the water cut off. Some of them were endangered species and many of them were killed in order to supposedly save one species. All this was carried out during this unconstitutional and highly illegal political experiment to supposedly justify saving an endangered suckerfish that later the courts ruled “never needed saving” in the first place! Again, just like the spotted owl, the suckerfish was being used as a ploy tactic for some to make money in the guise of a moral superiority. Here we see evidences of other agendas at work behind the scenes.
If your idea of a better world is to actively work to make this world a world with less people, then you probably want to see more dams gone. However, if you know enough about the issue and you are using sound science to the best of your abilities to decide if a dam should stay or go, “with having humanity and our needs involved in the equation,” congratulations! You’ve done all you could do!
List of some major dams targeted by
Are your local dams targeted?
The New World Order Connection
The British Fabian Group in England formed a group to bring about global Marxist-Communism. A study reflected by their manifesto to create the New World Order shot-handedly reads:
1) Rich nations will not want to willfully
merge with poor nations because the poor nations
will sap the rich nations strength.
This is the backwards logic of Socialists. Rather than inspiring others and attempting to bring others up, so all could live better, they work to bring those who have worked their way up, down. This is called “The crabs in a barrel syndrome.” When you put a bunch of crabs in a barrel, there will always be those who get the bright idea to attempt to climb out. When that happens the other Socialist crabs will reach up and pull him back down. This is the backwards intellect of Socialism. It does NOT attempt to uplift mankind but it attempts to only bring those who have worked to get ahead down ……. Down so everything is on a level playing field. THIS IS WHY SOCIALISM IS CALLED “SHARED POVERTY,” AND THIS IS WHY THE SUBVERSIVES ARE ATTEMPTING TO BRING THE DAMS AND AMERICA DOWN WITH THEM.
WITH THAT SAID, NAFTA NEVER NEEDED TO TAKE PLACE IN ORDER TO ECONOMICALLY HELP POOR COUNTRIES. AS AMERICAN’S HAVE BEEN SAYING FOR YEARS IS, “ALL’S THE POOR COUNTRIES HAVE TO DO TO BE EQUAL TO THE U.S. AND OUR BLESSINGS IS REPLICATE OUR FORM OF CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT.”
In 1963 political columnist Dan Smoot did a study of the stated purpose of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. His conclusion came to these four points, and they fit right into today’s America. They are:
1) To strip the United States of it’s
I believe that these things have either happened or are in the process of happening to induce the merger. As we can plainly see with treaties known as NAFTA, GATT, FTAA & CAFTA. These treaties are clearly exporting our jobs and importing our products. This is NOT GOOD for America, NO matter what the lying media attempts to make you believe.
There was another report done to study how to perform the global merger. It was known as “The Report from Iron Mountain.” The Report from Iron Mountain is considered a hoax by some, but never the less, we clearly see the recommendations presented in the book are being carried out and coming to pass. Here’s a summery of parts of the report published in The New American magazine under an article entitled “Shackling Planet Earth” (10-04-93).
A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations is an incredible study prepared in 1961 by Professor Lincoln P. Bloomfield (CFR) of MIT under a contract (No. SCC 28270) with the State Department, which was then under Secretary of State Dean Rusk (CFR). The global regime contemplated by the study, said Bloomfield, would "be referred to unblushingly as a 'world government.'"
The problem, he reported, was that it could take a couple hundred years or more for this global governance to evolve naturally and consensually. However, he had a plan to "bypass the main path of history, short-circuiting the organic stages of consensus."
The Bloomfield scheme involved "a crisis, a war, or a brink-of-war situation so grave or commonly menacing that deeply rooted attitudes and practices are sufficiently shaken to open the possibility of a revolution in world political arrangements." "According to this version," he said, "the order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks."
But what crisis "so grave or commonly menacing" could be devised for the purpose? To solve that dilemma, Insiders in the Kennedy Administration convened a Special Study Group of 15 men at a secret facility at Iron Mountain, New York during the summer of 1963. Their mission: Come up with alternatives to war that would provide the same social and political "stabilizing" function. The findings were released in the book, “Report from Iron Mountain.”
The Iron Mountain group reported that a war substitute "would require 'alternate enemies,' some of which might seem ... farfetched in the context of the current war system." The participants considered a number of general social welfare programs as possible substitutes: health, transportation, education, housing, poverty, etc., but were not satisfied with any of them. "It is more probable, in our judgement," they opined, "that such a threat will have to be invented...."
"Like its political function," said the
diabolical brain trust, "the motivational function
of war requires the existence of a genuinely
menacing social enemy." The "alternate enemy,"
they contended in the report, "must imply a more
immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of
destruction. It must justify the need for taking
and paying a 'blood price' in wide areas of human
concern." With this in mind, the group felt, the
possible substitute enemies they were considering
were woefully inadequate.
And now you know why environmental organizations have so many government-funded grants and philanthropic funding behind them. This is the same reason why they have such great media hype and are so insulated from media persecution and so illegally protected from counter suits. It is the same reason why they have so many unconstitutional laws set up exclusively for them in their favor. This is the same tactics that other totalitarians have used in the past. I.E. Create an artificial problem and have the street level activists hype the problem and push the masses to demand a solution to the problem. Here, the road to hell truly is paved with good intentions!
What must be done?
Due to the dangers listed in this article and since it is known that many of these groups operate on illicit tactics and contain subversives, there should be no reason that any of them continue to receive any government funding. It is plainly not right that our government funds one political group of people over another! Secondly our government has no right to fund groups, such as these, because it creates incentives to induce environmentally fraudulent cases.
There needs to be penalties involved in cases of found anti-American activities and environmental subversion. Because of the amount of junk science involved in environmental politics there needs to be double-blind studies conducted in order to stride to find the truth. No more one way street of people just claiming something and go sue! The teachings in our schools MUST become transparent. Parents have the right to know what’s being pumped into their children’s heads.
Water is our life blood! Those directed by self interests or propaganda who think that taking out a particular dam here and there won’t hurt them or their particular area aren’t seeing the big picture. Political movements once set in motion snowball and nearly always end up going way too far before they can be stopped! You take out enough dams as I believe the green subversives are attempting to do, and you’ve economically destroyed the country!!! The impacts can be so sever that the consequences come back around and bite us all, -including the subversives- directly in the bud.
Ironically, just like many Germans played into Hitler’s hands and many Russians played into Marx’s hands many environmentalists are well intended dupes that are unknowingly playing into the hands of their very enemy through their own movement!
Don’t believe it? Continue reading and
see this vitally important web link:
Likewise all of this information is available to anyone on the internet, however very few people have the time to research through it. Look at NAFTA, Agenda 21, the Wildlands Project. They are all derived through “massive” amounts of papers. How can anyone read them all to actually know what’s going on? Very few people, –even those who vote for us in congress- have even read one of them.
What can clearly be seen through all of this is
that the environmental movement is not a movement
that originated solely through people reacting to
environmental degradation or a cause. NO! As in
many cases of movements, the environmental
movement operates on a “manufactured
crisis” to propel itself. In political
circles, it is known as, “management by
crisis.” It is designed by insiders
within governments and most of the media and
public schools are their mouth piece to promote
Like the environmental movement is one of the arms used to create excessive laws, to restrict mankind, more catastrophes are to come in order to provide government with more excuses to lay more excessive laws upon the people in order to establish the New World Order.
This article is an attempt to get through to those who have been duped into following the designs of the change agents. It is an attempt to snap them out of the brainwashing from propaganda of environmentalism. It is an attempt to get them to take the blinders off and see what’s going on and how their being deceived so they will turn away from it’s influence and put their energies into a more just cause ……… I.E. To expose the mechanisms stated herein.
In their zeal to depopulate the world the false environmentalists have instilled amongst many within our society the notion that the natural world cannot be improved upon and only the natural world is supreme. With this notion they have already set many new UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws and regulations into place to keep what is natural away from man. Because of this, many construction projects are stonewalled or all together stopped from being carried out because of the prohibitive high costs and / or restrictions under these new laws or regulations on merely the insane grounds that, “that’s NOT natural or a natural thing to do.” To say that man does not have the capabilities or talent to beautify, enhance or just plain improve upon the natural world is just down right asinine. If the anti-dam campaign is allowed to escalate fully to the point of where the false environmentalists want to take it, -911 will pale in comparison!-
It should go without me needing to say that ALL dams are good or perfect, no some -very few- of the bunch need to go. However, the point to all of this is that we live in times where subversion in politics and in the sciences have become common place. With that, you’d better be sure you know who you’re working for. Are you working for where the good of all things are taken into consideration along with the good and rights of man? Or are you working for the dark side?
With this, I must say that fish and dams CAN coexist. They MUST and we DO have the capabilities to make it happen ……… We have NO other choice!
You must come to realize you are a victim of a giant scheme. You must come to realize that no matter if you are a multimillionaire or a pauper everything you own, your family and your countrymen’s lives are at stake. They are counting on you to be to apathetic and lazy. With that said, if you think you have a hard life now, wait until every moment of your existence is about attempting to obtain shelter and food. Those who control the water [supplies] control the people.
A nation can survive its fools, and even the
ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from
within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable,
for he is known and he carries his banners openly
against the city. But the traitor moves among
those within the gates freely, his sly whispers
rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very
halls of government itself.
The clown came and warned you!…………..
Did you listen?
For better comprehension and to fully understand how dangerous this movement is, I urge everyone who has read this article to see the 2 extremely important links posted above and please help pass this critical information on, and do what you can to STOP our beneficial dams from needlessly being destroyed.
Doug is an independent environmental
research analyst specializing in aspects of
Links to Communism / Socialism Unmasked:
come on dams and environmentalism!
“Patriotism is supporting your country all the
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, sustainable development, democracy, public disclosure, and social justice issues, etc. We have included the full text of the article rather than a simple link because we have found that links frequently go "bad" or change over time. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Compiled 11/21/06 by Doug
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2006, All Rights Reserved