Time to Take Action
Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.



-About water, power, food and the environmental movement-

A pro-dam perspective by Doug

Doug is an independent environmental research analyst specializing in aspects of
exposing and combating false environmentalism and propaganda. 
(Doug asks that his name be withheld for fear of retribution. He asked us
if we would provide a home for his information on KBC News website.)


You are under attack……. and you don’t even know it!  When an enemy attacks a country in a war, almost always the country’s dams are targeted.  Why?  Because dams provide the basis to life and the enemies objective is to kill that life.  Today almost all of our dams across the country are under a physical attack or a preemptive smear attack through propaganda.  There are HUNDREDS of coalitions within and without our country that are working to have THOUSANDS of our dams destroyedDon’t believe it?  Do a Internet search.  Type in the words “remove dam.”   You’ll see page after page of environmental organizations come up.  They claim that they want the dams removed in the name helping or saving a disturbed plant or animal or ecological system.  But is this the only reason they are doing this?  Or is there more to it?   

Consider what some have said
"We must make this an insecure and inhospitable place for capitalists and their projects . . . …. We must reclaim the roads and plowed land, halt dam construction, tear down existing dams, free shackled rivers and return to wilderness millions of tens of millions of acres of presently settled land." -- David Foreman,(Excerpts from his book Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkey Wrenching)  Foreman is Co-founder of Earth First!  Foreman has also been on the Sierra Club's five member executive committee in 1995-6 and is an architect of the Wildlands Project.

Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse?  Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about? -- Maurice Strong, Head of the 1992 UNESCO Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro

This expansionist, no-limits-to-growth paradigm has resulted in global environmental deterioration and diminished quality of life for everyone. It is the root cause of social, political and economic instability and insecurity …….  All of the over-populated countries in the world, including the United States of America, need to implement programs for gradual population reduction over the next 20, 50, 100 and 200 years. The environmental, economic, political and social benefits will be incalculable. Of course, population reduction is only one ingredient of the new paradigm.  Excerpts from: http://www.1worldcommunication.org/damisinformation.htm 

"If you ask me, it'd be a little short of disastrous for us to discover a source of clean, cheap, abundant energy because of what we would do with it. We ought to be looking for energy sources that are adequate for our needs, but that won't give us the excesses of concentrated energy with which we could do mischief to the earth or to each other." Amory Lovins in The Mother Earth - Plowboy Interview, Nov/Dec 1977, p. 22

"The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States: We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the U.S. We have to stop these third world countries right where they are. And it is important to the rest of the world to make sure that they don't suffer economically by virtue of our stopping them." -- Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

…….."My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness with it's full complement of species returning throughout the world." -- David Foreman

"…It is not enough to oppose the construction of new dams. It is time to free our shackled rivers and tear down Hetch Hetchy, Glen Canyon, New Melones, Tellico and other concrete monstrosities."  Excerpts from Earth First! News.

We have wished, we ecofreaks, for a disaster or for a social change to come and bomb us into Stone Age, where we might live like Indians in our valley, with our localism, our appropriate technology, our gardens, our homemade religion ….guilt-free at last!  Stewart Brand (Whole Earth Catalogue)

One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangladeshis... This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world populations, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it."                                 --Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, 1991

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fir the bill…… 1991 Club of Roam book, “First Global Revolution”

What you just read is a very small list of all the genocidal talk going on with these people.  Now, as we can see, by what they’ve said, they are actively working to: 1) Reduce population.  2) Destroy industrialized civilization, and 3) Return the earth to wilderness (their idea of Eden).  The scary thing about all of this is that many of the people talking this way have great wealth and power.  They are quite often on the board of directors or steering committees of many of the biggest and most powerful environmental organizations.  They are the ones directing how the movement works and its long term goals.  Thus, many of times they are the same players behind the save the __________ tree, ________ fish, ________ bird, ________ fly, ad infinitum.  Thus, as we have just seen, and as everyone knows, this is NOT always a movement to save this or that!  This is a movement that has a wide range of people at play, from the sincere  do-gooder to those actively working to carry out genocide!  Don’t believe it?  Continue reading and

See this extremely important online Power Point presentation:


"It happened that a fire broke out backstage in a theatre. The clown came out to inform the public. They thought it was just a jest and applauded. He repeated his warning, but they shouted even louder. So I think the world will come to an end amid general applause from all the wits, who believe that it is a joke."
-Søren Kierkegaard.- from Provocations-


We can’t live without our dams!
We only have 5 life sustaining major resources to draw from, they are: 1) Mining, 2) timber, 3) water, 4) energy and 5) food.  This is why dams are under attack, because dams provide us with 3 of the 5 life support systems!  
No hemp is not one of the five major life sustaining resources, sorry all you Hemppies. 

Dams provide us with lakes, teaming with fish, they store water so we can grow food and have it on our tap in our houses.  Many farms cannot exist without them, and in turn the farms, at times, quite often feed in excess of 50% of the wildlife.  They supply our rivers with water in times of drought.  They charge our aqua filters and provide life to wetlands.  Currently hydroelectric dams produce our most efficient, low-cost, abundant, clean, sustainable, renewable energy we can obtain.  While the rest of the world is advancing by building more hydropower plants, we are working on ways to take our dams out.  With this, while the rest of the world works to continue to advance, we work to digress.
We live in a world that is growing increasingly more dangerous daily.  A world that is demanding more and more water, power and food daily.  When we act asininely by throwing away our water, power and food by tearing down productive dams, we simultaneously are biting the hand that feeds us.  Second to this, it weakens our economic strength and makes us an easier target to aggressive nations that want to see us powerless and vulnerable.  We are flirting with disaster!  You can be assured once an aggressive nation, or a conglomerate of nations feel they can over power us, with little danger to themselves, they’ll make their move.

Don’t fall for the brainwashing
All areas targeted to have dams removed are preemptively fed a media bias to cause the people to go along with dam breaching.  So if this article makes you feel uneasy or down right mad, now you know why …… You’ve been primed to uncritically think against this.  With this, I ask that you attempt to over come any prejudgments, read on, and see if you learn something from this.  Alls I ask is that you hear all sides and judge for yourself, so that you know that you attempted to obtain an informed balanced opinion. And you truly gave it your best shot to make wise decisions on how to act.  

You don’t know what money is until you’re in this biz.  Being that the anti-dam movement has been allowed to go as far as it has indicates that most people DON’T HAVE A CLUE to what’s happening and nor do they realize how important dams are in their everyday life.  The anti-dam movement is not just a isolated incident to your home town.  Today it is a nationwide movement that is picking up momentum.  Dam busting is now becoming an international “MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR BIG BUSINESS” with slick ad campaigns designed to sway you into the anti-dam mentality so you take politically correct action to help enable all the anti-dam players to make the BIG bucks …… It is now a international movement that will prove to utterly destroy the nation if it is not stopped!  As of September 2006 The American Rivers website lists some 177 dams removed in the U.S. from 1999 to 2005.  Another 49 are targeted or are in the process or have already have been removed in this year (2006).

Fish, especially salmon, are normally the number one ploy tactic used to breach dams worldwide.  Thus, in my opinion, will prove to put millions of people out of work, wreck economies, reduce food, water and energy where these movements are allowed to go unchecked.  With this, there are plenty of indicators showing that salmon and their numbers are intentionally being killed or kept from spawning in order to keep populations down to keep the false environmental money making machine rolling.  This is also one of the reasons predator species are now being allowed to flourish.  It is a FACT that salmon science and statistics are quite often manipulated to produce a bias outcome.  The spotted owl is being used as a red herring dressed in a salmon suit.  That is, salmon are being used against dams the same way the spotted owl was being used against the timber industry.  It was a ploy and “everybody knows it!”

Why do some people want the dams out?
There are 5 major motives behind this.  They are:
1) MONEY.  Money is normally the number one reason.  Removing dams is a gravy train to environmentalists, attorneys, collaborators, studiers and stakeholders, that is, anyone with a vested interest.  Dam removal is mainly paid out at taxpayer expense through grants towards the environmental organizations and stakeholders, the attorneys make it in litigations.  Today our schools are churning out thousands of environmental students.  The lure is high pay.  Their jobs will be to “micro” manage (i.e. POLICE) ALL facets of the environment in the entire country –including your private property.-  Most of these “jobs” in all reality are a total waste of time and money, and are not needed in any way, shape or form because most environmental issues do not actually require a micro-managed multimillion dollar study to determine the mating habits of a certain fly or how a river flows …… Just common sense is normally all it takes to address many of these issues.
2) BRAINWASHING & BAD SCIENCE.  It is said, “The best lies told embody the most truth.”  With this, most dam breaching (dis)information is NOT based on sound science, but on a green subversive propaganda.  As stated earlier, the false environmental organizations feed the targeted areas junk science to the media.  As Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda minister, stated, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it people will eventually come to believe it."  In other words, lies repeated over time makes dupes out of the people.  The disinformation campaign can be so slick that it redirects the thought process of the most well intended.  These people, in turn act as the machine to start the ball rolling for talks to remove dams.  The process goes on from there.  My main concern here is that the lie (i.e. dams are the number one source of almost all river problems all the time) will gain strength with time.  It will because the lies are the politically correct (mis)information that the P.C. schools and media are continually  pushing.  If these lies go unchallenged and uncorrected and continue to infest the minds of the masses, no dam in America will be safe.

3) LAND CONFISCATION.  Another reason for breaching dams is land confiscation.  This highly illicit tactic has been going on for a while in this country.  Recently it has been getting worse because no one (very rarely) has anyone had the knowledge or power  to challenge these bully organizations so they keep on the attack.
The tactic normally works like this: A knock is heard at your door.  A man in a suit says his organization is interested in purchasing your land, and would you be willing to have a conversation on the issue?  If you say no, they come back later.  If you say yes, you talk and he presents his organizations no-deal, pre-planned offering.  If you turn it down, they turn up the heat.
This is done in a verity of ways.  They can look for ways to devalue your home, ranch, farm, business indirectly or directly through condemnation.  Condemnation can result in you owning a totally worthless piece of property that cannot be used for anything.  One of the direct methods to achieve land confiscation is to find or plant an endangered species on your property or declare you live on a wetland.  If this should happen, your land could be placed totally OFF LIMITS to any form of improvements or development.  It can get to the point of NO ACCESS by anyone depending on the status of endanger species found (or subversively planted) on your property.
The indirect method is to wreck havoc on an entire town’s economy by, shutting off its water, as they did in Klamath Falls Oregon or shut down its major employment companies, such as, a lumber mill or a mine in a small town.  In the case of towns that reside on lakes, alls they have to do is find a reason to breach the dam based on what is “supposedly” good for their selected endangered species.  All of this was illustrated in the Klamath Basin crisis.  All of this was, or can be done, with NO REGARDS to other endangered species, the town, the people, the economy, the loss of stored water, the fish in the lake, the aqua filter, the cost of dam removal, the estuaries, the tax surcharge, the farms, the toxic sediment fall out, flash flooding, the loss of needed hydropower, erosion control, the loss of tourism, the interdependent services that exist because of the foregoing, or the overall good because of that towns existence.  This alone is proof of other agendas at work!

4) DESTROY the U.S.  There are subversives working for the destruction of the nation.  One of their sole tenants was to spread the ideas of current-day America being based on ideologies of evil.  To indoctrinate our own culture they have twisted many of our concepts, highlighted the bad side of our history and omitted many of the good aspects.  Today, with the help of our public schools, this bias of thinking has become common place.  Thus today we have many of our own people actively working for the over throw of the nation they never truly came to know.

5) It’s the RIGHT THING.  Infrequently –very infrequently- removing a dam is the right thing to do for environmental or defective dam reasons.  However, definitely NOT for as many reasons as false environmentalist would attempt to have you believe.       

Making it Personal
What it all comes down to is this, anyone acting as an advocate to have dams removed must truthfully ask themselves some very serious questions.  Questions such as:

“Do I really know enough about this issue to be advocating to having a dam destroyed?”
“Have I studied both sides (pro’s & con’s) of the argument?”  “If so what was my source of information?”  “Did the information come from people of vested interests, such as, fishermen and farmers, or did it come from environmentalists and others, such as, front groups, or the media, studiers, lobbyists, bureaucrats, demolition personnel, etc. who would stand from making a profit if the dam(s) should come down?”  “Do I really know what I’m talking about or am I simply repeating the clichés of the people I associate with and a biased news media?”  “Are my motives based on sound science and the common good of all things concerned or more on self-serving interests?”

Here’s how to tell if dam removal is justified:

If I act as an advocate to have a dam(s) removed how would it actually impact and justify destroying a pre-established functioning ecosystem?  How about the damage that it would inflict on the local communities?  Would it justify how it would effect: flood control, hydro power, farm irrigation, water tables and aqua filters, erosion control, recreation, fire fighting, fishing, fish hatcheries, barge shipping, wet lands, wildlife habitat, species and endangered species, uncontrollable water supplies and temperatures, jobs, economy, emergency water supplies, river water moderation, boating, tourism?  Is it worth while to wreck havoc on all of these points to conduct an experiment to see if we can [supposedly] maintain a certain amount of plants or animals?

During the Klamath basin crisis, not only were the farmers hurt but there were 489 species of animals placed at risk during the water cut off.  Some of them were endangered species and many of them were killed in order to supposedly save one species.  All this was carried out during this unconstitutional and highly illegal political experiment to supposedly justify saving an endangered suckerfish that later the courts ruled “never needed saving” in the first place!  Again, just like the spotted owl, the suckerfish was being used as a ploy tactic for some to make money in the guise of a moral superiority.  Here we see evidences of other agendas at work behind the scenes.    

If your idea of a better world is to actively work to make this world a world with less  people, then you probably want to see more dams gone.  However, if you know enough about the issue and you are using sound science to the best of your abilities to decide if a dam should stay or go, “with having humanity and our needs involved in the equation,” congratulations!  You’ve done all you could do!  

List of some major dams targeted by green groups
Ice Harbor Dam, Lower Monumental Dam, Little Goose Dam, Lower Granite,
Bonneville, Hetch Hetchy, Glen Canyon, New Melones, Tellico, Hoover, Grand Couley, Shasta, Iron Gate, Copco #1, Copco #2, Fall Creek, J.C. Boyle, Keno, Link River, The Dalles, John Day, McNary, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite, etc, etc, etc.  These are just a few listed ……. hundreds more targeted.  

Are your local dams targeted?
ALMOST ALL DAMS IN YOUR AREA ARE UNDER ATTACK!  Don’t believe it?  Do an internet search.  Type in the “name” of the dam, followed by the word “dam,” followed by the word “remove.”  As of August 2006, the Friends of the River website shows 22 dams in California targeted for destruction in 2006 by their organization alone. This doesn’t include what’s on the growing list to be targeted by them and other organizations next year. They are just ONE of HUNDREDS of green litigation organizations around the country all doing the same thing against the dams in their areas.  If a particular dam does not come up in an internet search it probably is because it is too politically incorrect to target at this time and the false environmentalists already have their hands full.  As far as the removal of the Klamath dams go, it is not only about a movement to supposedly clean up a river, it is also a “working” case study (i.e. a model) to see how to progressively take more dams out.  Once the green wrecking ball picks up momentum, it’ll be harder than hell to stop …….. This is why the anti-dam movement must be stopped completely in its tracks.

The New World Order Connection
The objective of the New World Order is to place all nations under one elite ruled government.  In order to bring this about America is to be disarmed and brought down quite a few pegs.  Here’s a macro-view of the game plan.

The British Fabian Group in England formed a group to bring about global Marxist-Communism.  A study reflected by their manifesto to create the New World Order shot-handedly reads:

1) Rich nations will not want to willfully merge with poor nations because the poor nations will sap the rich nations strength.
2) Because of this, you cannot expect a developed nation to go directly into socialism.
3) In order to have a true world government, all nations must be merged together.
4) Because developed nations will not willfully merge with undeveloped nations and it is IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOCIALISM TO DEVELOP UNDEVELOPED NATIONS, DEVELOPED NATIONS MUST BE UNDEVELOPED.  This sounds like the Robin Hood technique of NAFTA to me ……. Take from the rich, give to the poor.

This is the backwards logic of Socialists.  Rather than inspiring others and attempting to bring others up, so all could live better, they work to bring those who have worked their way up, down.  This is called “The crabs in a barrel syndrome.”  When you put a bunch of crabs in a barrel, there will always be those who get the bright idea to attempt to climb out.  When that happens the other Socialist crabs will reach up and pull him back down.  This is the backwards intellect of Socialism.  It does NOT attempt to uplift mankind but it attempts to only bring those who have worked to get ahead down ……. Down so everything is on a level playing field.  THIS IS WHY SOCIALISM IS CALLED “SHARED POVERTY,” AND THIS IS WHY THE SUBVERSIVES ARE ATTEMPTING TO BRING THE DAMS AND AMERICA DOWN WITH THEM.


In 1963 political columnist Dan Smoot did a study of the stated purpose of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.  His conclusion came to these four points, and they fit right into today’s America.  They are:

1) To strip the United States of it’s gold reserve.
2) To build up the industrial capacities of other nations.
3) To remove markets from American producers.
4) To entwine America’s affairs with other nations so that the U.S. could no longer act independently.

I believe that these things have either happened or are in the process of happening to induce the merger.  As we can plainly see with treaties known as NAFTA, GATT, FTAA & CAFTA.  These treaties are clearly exporting our jobs and importing our products.  This is NOT GOOD for America, NO matter what the lying media attempts to make you believe.

There was another report done to study how to perform the global merger.  It was known as “The Report from Iron Mountain.”  The Report from Iron Mountain is considered a hoax by some, but never the less, we clearly see the recommendations presented in the book are being carried out and coming to pass.  Here’s a summery of parts of the report published in The New American magazine under an article entitled “Shackling Planet Earth” (10-04-93).

A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations is an incredible study prepared in 1961 by Professor Lincoln P. Bloomfield (CFR) of MIT under a contract (No. SCC 28270) with the State Department, which was then under Secretary of State Dean Rusk (CFR). The global regime contemplated by the study, said Bloomfield, would "be referred to unblushingly as a 'world government.'"

The problem, he reported, was that it could take a couple hundred years or more for this global governance to evolve naturally and consensually. However, he had a plan to "bypass the main path of history, short-circuiting the organic stages of consensus."

The Bloomfield scheme involved "a crisis, a war, or a brink-of-war situation so grave or commonly menacing that deeply rooted attitudes and practices are sufficiently shaken to open the possibility of a revolution in world political arrangements." "According to this version," he said, "the order we examine may be brought into existence as a result of a series of sudden, nasty, and traumatic shocks."

But what crisis "so grave or commonly menacing" could be devised for the purpose?  To solve that dilemma, Insiders in the Kennedy Administration convened a Special Study Group of 15 men at a secret facility at Iron Mountain, New York during the summer of 1963. Their mission: Come up with alternatives to war that would provide the same social and political "stabilizing" functionThe findings were released in the book, “Report from Iron Mountain.”

The Iron Mountain group reported that a war substitute "would require 'alternate enemies,' some of which might seem ... farfetched in the context of the current war system." The participants considered a number of general social welfare programs as possible substitutes: health, transportation, education, housing, poverty, etc., but were not satisfied with any of them. "It is more probable, in our judgement," they opined, "that such a threat will have to be invented...."

"Like its political function," said the diabolical brain trust, "the motivational function of war requires the existence of a genuinely menacing social enemy." The "alternate enemy," they contended in the report, "must imply a more immediate, tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction. It must justify the need for taking and paying a 'blood price' in wide areas of human concern." With this in mind, the group felt, the possible substitute enemies they were considering were woefully inadequate.

According to the report, however, "One exception might be the environmental-pollution model, if the danger to society it posed was genuinely imminent. The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction, underscored with not a inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life...." If these conditions could be met, the study concluded hopefully, "It may be ... that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility of mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species."…………..

And now you know why environmental organizations have so many government-funded grants and philanthropic funding behind them.  This is the same reason why they have such great media hype and are so insulated from media persecution and so illegally protected from counter suits.  It is the same reason why they have so many unconstitutional laws set up exclusively for them in their favor.   This is the same tactics that other totalitarians have used in the past.  I.E. Create an artificial problem and have the street level activists hype the problem and push the masses to demand a solution to the problem.  Here, the road to hell truly is paved with good intentions!  

What must be done?
Forward this to as many people as you can.  Work like it all depends on you.  Pray like it all depends on God.  Constitutional Law MUST be enforced.  Don’t let those who are attempting to trump Constitutional Law continue to do so!  The false environmentalists must be exposed!  They must be recognized for who they are and what they are attempting to do.

Due to the dangers listed in this article and since it is known that many of these groups operate on illicit tactics and contain subversives, there should be no reason that any of them continue to receive any government funding.  It is plainly not right that our government funds one political group of people over another!  Secondly our government has no right to fund groups, such as these, because it creates incentives to induce environmentally fraudulent cases. 

There needs to be penalties involved in cases of found anti-American activities and environmental subversion. Because of the amount of junk science involved in environmental politics there needs to be double-blind studies conducted in order to stride to find the truth.  No more one way street of people just claiming something and go sue!  The teachings in our schools MUST become transparent.  Parents have the right to know what’s being pumped into their children’s heads.     

Water is our life blood!  Those directed by self interests or propaganda who think that taking out a particular dam here and there won’t hurt them or their particular area aren’t seeing the big picture.  Political movements once set in motion snowball and nearly always end up going way too far before they can be stopped!  You take out enough dams as I believe the green subversives are attempting to do, and you’ve economically destroyed the country!!!  The impacts can be so sever that the consequences come back around and bite us all, -including the subversives- directly in the bud.

Ironically, just like many Germans played into Hitler’s hands and many Russians played into Marx’s hands many environmentalists are well intended dupes that are unknowingly playing into the hands of their very enemy through their own movement!

Don’t believe it?  Continue reading and see this vitally important web link:

The environmental movement is a branch stemming from what is known as the “open conspiracy.”  It is called the open conspiracy because it’s intents on what’s going on is made known and out in the open.  You wonder how a conspiracy can be “out in the open?”  Easy.  In two words, “over information.”  A recent example of over information can be seen in NAFTA and the “Super Highway” project.  Recently (Nov. 2006) the Bush administration was charged, by some, with conspiracy to build the super highway.  The administration responded, “How can that be a conspiracy, when the information was made known to the world on the internet?” 

Likewise all of this information is available to anyone on the internet, however very few people have the time to research through it.  Look at NAFTA, Agenda 21, the Wildlands Project.  They are all derived through “massive” amounts of papers.  How can anyone read them all to actually know what’s going on?  Very few people, –even those who vote for us in congress- have even read one of them. 

What can clearly be seen through all of this is that the environmental movement is not a movement that originated solely through people reacting to environmental degradation or a cause.  NO!  As in many cases of movements, the environmental movement operates on a “manufactured crisis” to propel itself.  In political circles, it is known as, “management by crisis.”  It is designed by insiders within governments and most of the media and public schools are their mouth piece to promote it.

The people behind the New World Order don’t want a free people.  They want a people they can control!  To overcome resistance, they want a duped people who will “willingly” walk into bondage by surrendering their freedoms in exchange for security.  This is why we will be assured more catastrophes to come …… So the people will demand security.  

Like the environmental movement is one of the arms used to create excessive laws, to restrict mankind, more catastrophes are to come in order to provide government with more excuses to lay more excessive laws upon the people in order to establish the New World Order.

This article is an attempt to get through to those who have been duped into following the designs of the change agents.  It is an attempt to snap them out of the brainwashing from propaganda of environmentalism.  It is an attempt to get them to take the blinders off and  see what’s going on and how their being deceived so they will turn away from it’s influence and put their energies into a more just cause ……… I.E. To expose the mechanisms stated herein.  

In their zeal to depopulate the world the false environmentalists have instilled amongst many within our society the notion that the natural world cannot be improved upon and only the natural world is supreme.  With this notion they have already set many new UNCONSTITUTIONAL laws and regulations into place to keep what is natural away from man.  Because of this, many construction projects are stonewalled or all together stopped from being carried out because of the prohibitive high costs and / or restrictions under these new laws or regulations on merely the insane grounds that, “that’s NOT natural or a natural thing to do.”  To say that man does not have the capabilities or talent to beautify, enhance or just plain improve upon the natural world is just down right asinine.  If the anti-dam campaign is allowed to escalate fully to the point of where the false environmentalists want to take it, -911 will pale in comparison!-

It should go without me needing to say that ALL dams are good or perfect, no some -very few- of the bunch need to go.  However, the point to all of this is that we live in times where subversion in politics and in the sciences have become common place.  With that, you’d better be sure you know who you’re working for.  Are you working for where the good of all things are taken into consideration along with the good and rights of man?  Or are you working for the dark side?

With this, I must say that fish and dams CAN coexist.  They MUST and we DO have the capabilities to make it happen ……… We have NO other choice!

You must come to realize you are a victim of a giant scheme.  You must come to realize that no matter if you are a multimillionaire or a pauper everything you own, your family and your countrymen’s lives are at stake.  They are counting on you to be to apathetic and lazy.  With that said, if you think you have a hard life now, wait until every moment of your existence is about attempting to obtain shelter and food.  Those who control the water [supplies] control the people.

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.  –Cicero-

When the Nazi’s were invading Churchill told the people of England:
If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not to costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival.”  Because we have ignored warning after warning, we are now at that place in history.  Unless you do your part now, you will face a further choice ……..
There may be a worse fate.  You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves.

The clown came and warned you!…………..

Did you listen?

For better comprehension and to fully understand how dangerous this movement is, I urge everyone who has read this article to see the 2 extremely important links posted above and please help pass this critical information on, and do what you can to STOP our beneficial dams from needlessly being destroyed.

Thank You!

Doug is an independent environmental research analyst specializing in aspects of
exposing and combating false environmentalism and propaganda. 

  You have rights to reprint and distribute this article by any means possible.  Article, author and all links listed MUST be reprinted in its entirety.

Links to Communism / Socialism Unmasked:
Beware strong contents enclosed

THE LAW by Frederic Bastiat


More to come on dams and environmentalism! 
Check back later for updates.

“Patriotism is supporting your country all the time,
 and your government when it deserves it.”
  -Mark Twain-

The results of this article are strictly the “thoughts and opinions” of the author compiled from his view points and studies.  Because all issues contained herein are debatable the author makes no assertion of one hundred percent accuracy on all topics and wants the readers to question everything and come to their own conclusions.  The author is not saying all environmentalism is bad, wrong or incorrect, it is just something I say we need to keep a constant eye on.  The author of this article is not making any broad brushed smear attacks on entire groups of people.  With the wording “FALSE” environmentalist I am making a distinction between true and false environmentalist and/or environmentalism.  However, I am pointing out that there definitely are dangerous subversives and terrorists embedded in many of these environmental litigation groups and in many cases these false environmentalists are the ones steering the direction on where the movement goes and acts.  Today, for good reason, the FBI lists these false environmentalists as America’s number one domestic terrorists.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, sustainable development, democracy, public disclosure, and social justice issues, etc. We have included the full text of the article rather than a simple link because we have found that links frequently go "bad" or change over time. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Compiled 11/21/06 by Doug 

Home Contact


Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM  Pacific

Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2006, All Rights Reserved