Farmers target EPA report they say might tax cows
JOHNSON, Capital Press 12/08/08
MONTGOMERY, Ala. - For farmers, this stinks: Belching and gaseous
cows and hogs could start costing them money if the federal
government decides to charge fees for air-polluting animals.
Farmers so far are turning their noses up at the notion, which
they contend is a possible consequence of an Environmental
Protection Agency report after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in
2007 that greenhouse gases from motor vehicles amounts to air
"This is one of the most ridiculous things the federal government
has tried to do," said Alabama Agriculture Commissioner Ron
Sparks, an outspoken opponent of the fees.
EPA officials insisted Friday that the lengthy, highly technical
report, which mostly focuses on other sources of air pollution,
does not include a proposal to tax livestock.
But the American Farm Bureau Federation said, based on federal
agriculture department figures, it would require farms or ranches
with more than 25 dairy cows, 50 beef cattle or 200 hogs to pay an
annual fee of about $175 for each dairy cow, $87.50 per head of
beef cattle and $20 for each hog.
The executive vice president of the Wyoming Farm Bureau
Federation, Ken Hamilton, estimated the fee would cost owners of a
modest-sized cattle ranch $30,000 to $40,000 a year. He said he
has talked to a number of livestock owners about the proposals,
and "all have said if the fees were carried out, it would bankrupt
Sparks said Wednesday he's worried the fee could be extended to
chickens and other farm animals and cause more meat to be
"We'll let other countries put food on our tables like they are
putting gas in our cars. Other countries don't have the health
standards we have," Sparks said.
The farm groups say the fee would apply to farms with livestock
operations that emit more than 100 tons of carbon emissions in a
year and fall under federal Clean Air Act provisions.
EPA officials said the agency has not taken a position on any of
the matters discussed in its response to the Supreme Court ruling.
And John Millett, a spokesman for EPA's air and radiation
division, said there has been an oversimplification of the EPA's
document "to the point of distortion."
"EPA is not proposing any type of tax on livestock," he said.
The EPA briefly mentions "raising livestock" in its report on ways
to regulate greenhouse gases under the provisions of the Clean Air
Act. Paul Schlegel, director of public policy for the American
Farm Bureau Federation, said it determined the possible fees that
could be imposed by using Agriculture Department statistics on the
amount of greenhouse gases that come from livestock and applied it
to the EPA's permitting rules.
Farmers from across the country have expressed outrage over the
EPA report, both on Internet sites and in opinions sent to EPA
during a public comment period that ended last week. Many call it
a "cow tax" and say the EPA proposed it.
"It's something that really has a very big potential adverse
impact for the livestock industry," said Rick Krause, the senior
director of congressional relations for the American Farm Bureau
The fee would cover the cost of a permit for the livestock
operations. While farmers say it would drive them out of business,
an organization supporting the proposal hopes it forces the farms
and ranches to switch to healthier crops.
"It makes perfect sense if you are looking for ways to cut down on
meat consumption and recoup environmental losses," said Bruce
Friedrich, a spokesman in Washington for People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals.
"We certainly support making factory farms pay their fair share,"
U.S. Rep. Robert Aderholt, a Republican from Haleyville in
northwest Alabama, said he has spoken with EPA officials and
doesn't believe the cow tax is a serious proposal that will ever
be adopted by the agency.
"Who comes up with this kind of stuff?" said Perry Mobley,
director of the Alabama Farmers Federation's beef division. "It
seems there is an ulterior motive, to destroy livestock farms.
This would certainly put them out of business."
The Associated Press