Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Judge rules against California Delta water system
Collection of articles by Family Farm Alliance Executive Director Dan Keppen, May 30, 2007
Judge says better management of delta needed - Associated Press
· Judge rules against water system; Action is another win for environmentalists concerned about how delta pumping operations affect the threatened native smelt - Los Angeles Times
· Another judge agrees: Projects harm delta fish - Contra Costa Times
· Judge: Smelt left unprotected; Delta pumping plan criticized in ruling - Fresno Bee
· Opinion: Preserving the imperiled California Delta; The fragile Northern California ecosystem from which L.A. gets much of its water can't wait very long for a plan to fix it - Los Angeles Times
Judge says better management of delta needed
Associated Press – 5/25/07
By Paul Elias, staff writer
SAN FRANCISCO - The government's management of the Sacramento delta runs afoul of sound science and a new management plan is needed for a region that supplies most of the state's water, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
U.S. District Court Judge Oliver Wanger in Fresno said federal and state water agencies have failed to adequately protect fish called smelt when pumping water from the delta. He said he wanted a new plan proposed within 30 days.
"The Delta smelt is undisputedly in jeopardy as to its survival and recovery," Wanger wrote in tossing out a 2005 pumping plan developed by federal scientists, who found the current program didn't jeopardize the fish. That finding was "arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law."
Giant pumps are constantly sucking water out of the delta and sending most of it to thirsty Southern California cities via an aqueduct visible along long stretches of Interstate 5. Lowered water levels in the delta are bad news for the smelt because their habitat often becomes warmer and saltier than they are accustomed.
The Fish and Wildlife Service in July 2004 said the Bureau of Reclamation's water management plans would not jeopardize endangered and threatened delta fish.
It renewed the scientific opinion in February 2005.
The Natural Resources Defense Council and five other environmental groups sued the Fish and Wildlife Service in February 2005. The action followed the federal agency's ruling that said increases in state and federal pumping from the delta to benefit farmers and Southern California cities would not harm federally protected delta smelt.
environmentalists asked a federal court to invalidate that
opinion, which Wanger did late Friday. "I think it sends a
pretty clear message to the agency that they can't treat the
delta like a piece of plumbing," said Earthjustice attorney
Andrea Treece, who represented many of the environmentalists who
Judge rules against water system; Action is another win for environmentalists concerned about how delta pumping operations affect the threatened native smelt
Los Angeles Times – 5/26/07
By Bettina Boxall, staff writer
For the second
time this year, a judge has ruled that management of
California's water system is illegally imperiling fish, making
it increasingly likely that the state will have to pump less
water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to Southern
California cities and Central Valley farms.
Another judge agrees: Projects harm delta fish
Contra Costa Times – 5/26/07
By Mike Taugher, staff writer
A federal judge Friday ruled that a permit allowing massive water delivery projects to be built in the delta is illegal because it fails to account for the risk posed to a species of tiny endangered fish.
It is the second time in two months that a court has declared the state's water projects in violation of endangered species laws.
The ruling comes the same week as a new study was released showing the delta smelt population has plunged closer to extinction.
U.S. District Judge Oliver Wanger in Fresno did not immediately revoke water agencies' ability to operate, saying such a step would amount to a "draconian" impact on the state's farms and cities.
However, his 120-page order seems likely to lead to cuts in the amount of water taken out of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta for use in the East Bay, Silicon Valley, San Joaquin Valley and Southern California.
At issue is a 2005 document issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that is supposed to analyze the impact the water projects have on delta smelt and then set limits on those projects to ensure the fish does not become extinct.
Wanger ruled that the document failed to include information that showed smelt populations were in very bad shape, and that it opted for a voluntary approach instead of setting firm requirements to protect the fish. The order said the Fish and Wildlife Service's document was too lenient to satisfy the Endangered Species Act.
"I think it sends a pretty strong signal that the agencies have to comply with the law rather than just skate by," said Andrea Treece, a lawyer for Earthjustice who argued the case for environmentalists.
The ruling is the latest development on the future of the delta ecosystem and the state's ability to sustain massive water deliveries.
A separate lawsuit challenges the water projects' authorization to harm protected salmon runs.
Last month, an Alameda County judge ordered the state-owned pumps shut off because no permit was ever issued under the state endangered species law. That order has been put on hold pending appeal.
A spokesman for the federal water agency, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, said a new permit was in the works and scheduled to be completed by July 2008.
"I don't know what happens in the meantime. We've never been here before," said the spokesman, Jeff McCracken.
The state Department of Water Resources, which has now been told by two different courts that its water operations are in violation of both state and federal endangered species laws, had no comment.
Wanger wrote in his order that he would hold a hearing on how to remedy the situation within 30 days.
Treece, the lawyer, said environmentalists would press the judge and the water agencies to follow recommendations from scientists about how to protect the fish.
"Maybe the agencies will start listening to their scientists now," she said. #
Judge: Smelt left unprotected; Delta pumping plan criticized in ruling
Fresno Bee – 5/26/07
By John Ellis, staff writer
Environmentalists are claiming victory after a federal judge in Fresno on Friday found a key opinion on the effects of water pumping in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta on the endangered delta smelt fish was "legally flawed."
U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger declined to impose any remedies until after environmentalists and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service confer on his decision.
Still, Andrea Treece, a lawyer for the Natural Resources Defense Council -- the lead plaintiff in the case -- said "certainly reductions in [water] pumping are on the table."
Wanger's decision will require the agency's opinion -- known as a "biological opinion" -- to be rewritten. That could affect those who depend on delta water deliveries, such as Southern California cities and the Westlands Water District.
The Natural Resources Defense Council and five other environmental groups sued the Fish and Wildlife Service in February 2005 in response to the opinion by the agency. The opinion was assembled in response to a U.S. Bureau of Reclamation water management plan for the delta.
In the 120-page decision, Wanger found the Fish and Wildlife Service didn't use the best-available scientific data or consider climate change in putting together its smelt impact report; failed to require any real-time protection for the tiny fish; failed to consider impacts to the smelt's habitat; and failed to analyze impacts on the smelt's overall population numbers.
The decision wasn't absolute, however. In two areas, Wanger ruled against the environmentalists.
"Overall, I think it certainly is a victory and hopefully a turning point in how agencies look at the delta and the way they approach its management," Treece said. "We hope this sends a very clear signal that they can't ignore the law anymore."
Fish and Wildlife Service spokesman Al Donner declined to comment specifically on the lawsuit because agency attorneys have yet to review it. Still, Donner said, the service has been working since last summer on an updated smelt impact report that it hopes to complete in the near future.
In an April hearing on the matter before Wanger, lawyers for the environmental groups claimed the agency had ignored 2004 data -- which showed a steep decline in the delta smelt population -- in favor of more favorable 2003 data when it was preparing the biological opinion.
At stake is a federal Endangered Species Act permit that allows both state and federal water-delivery projects to operate. Smelt are killed in the operation of pumps that send delta water southward.
While the agency works to update the opinion, Donner said, it also is working to help the delta smelt. Recent surveys, he said, show very small numbers of juvenile smelt, which is a concern. As part of that, he said, water pumping is at a very low level, which he said "should be good for the smelt."
Environmentalists also have a parallel lawsuit -- in which similar legal arguments are being made -- involving the effects of delta pumping on steelhead and salmon. #
Opinion: Preserving the imperiled California Delta; The fragile Northern California ecosystem from which L.A. gets much of its water can't wait very long for a plan to fix it
Los Angeles Times – 5/26/07
By Bill Stall, contributing editor to the Opinion page
DELTA AND DAWN, the wayward humpback
whales stranded near Rio Vista, have taught thousands about the
location of the California Delta, where the Sacramento and San
Joaquin rivers meet and flow toward San Francisco Bay. It's
about time: An estimated 23 million of us receive some or most
of our water from the delta.
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:14 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2007, All Rights Reserved