Time to Take Action
Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
 

 http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=salmondam29m&date=20060429
Spring run of chinook could be worst ever, Seattle Times 4/29/06, "They looked at ... fisheries and the take of an expanding sea lion population. The report concluded that none of those factors could have been responsible for the shortfall and affirmed the most important influence probably was a change in ocean conditions...And sport and commercial fisheries that opened earlier this spring resulted in decent catches of fish." (commentary by KBC: This article is interesting. On the Klamath, with a PREDICTED shortfall of non-endangered fall-run non-wild fish spawning outside the hatcheries, NOAA Fisheries, the Pacific Coast Management Council and tribes and environmentalists SHUT DOWN harvest, did not consider predation, did not consider ocean conditions, and chose to target Klamath Irrigators with 3% of the water use (which is mostly returned to the river) 200 miles from the ocean, and the 100 year old dams which have seen record salmon runs in the past few years.)

Spring run of chinook could be worst ever
By Hal Bernton, Seattle Times staff reporter 4/29/06

PORTLAND At this time of year, the Columbia Basin's fabled spring chinook should be swarming past the Bonneville Dam.

As of Thursday, fewer than 2,300 had swum through fish passages compared with a late-April average of more than 80,000 fish over the past decade.

Biologists still think they will get a late surge of fish those hopes were kindled by the passage of more than 600 fish on Thursday, compared with fewer than 50 on the same day a week ago. But for the end of April, typically near the peak, this still is a very weak run.


DON RYAN / AP, 2001Fishermen line the banks below the Bonneville Dam east of Portland in April 2001. As of two days ago, fewer than 2,300 spring chinook had swum through fish passages compared with a late-April average of more than 80,000 fish over the past decade.
"We definitely have the latest run on record, and we potentially could have the worst on record," said Robert Stansell, an Army Corps of Engineer biologist who monitors fish moving over the dam 40 miles east of Portland.

The spring chinook, a mix of wild and hatchery stock, are packed with oil that gives their flesh a rich taste and fuels a remarkable freshwater migration. Some push deep into Washington, while others, listed as threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act, spawn in Snake River drainages as far as 900 miles from ocean-feeding grounds.

The spring chinook run into June and are followed by other runs of Columbia River Basin summer and fall salmon, which are forecast to arrive in numbers large enough to schedule sport and commercial fishing openings.

But this year's dismal dam count underscores the volatility of the spring chinook runs, which have been one of the focal points of a Columbia Basin salmon-restoration effort that has cost billions of dollars during the past decade.

Scientists believe the ocean, where the fish migrate after their freshwater birth, has a big influence on run size.

Just five years ago, more than 400,000 Columbia Basin spring chinook returned from the ocean in the largest run since construction of the Bonneville Dam in 1938.

The fish benefited from strong seasonal ocean upwellings of nutrient-rich cold water that produced an abundance of food for young salmon. Those upwellings continued for the first few years of the new century along with freshwater conditions that also favored salmon.

"The good news is that salmon runs are up," proclaimed President Bush in an August 2003 stopover at Ice Harbor Dam. "And that's really positive, and we just need to keep the momentum up."

But that momentum has faded in recent years as upwellings weakened, and survival rates of salmon declined.

Still, scientists this year forecast a run of about 88,000 spring chinook, which still is about eight times higher than the record low return of 10,197 in 1995.

And sport and commercial fisheries that opened earlier this spring resulted in decent catches of fish.

That prompted biologists to think their forecasts based on the numbers of immature males that returned to the river last year were on track.

So where are the fish?

Perhaps their migration has been held off by cool weather and high water in the river and will storm through the dam in numbers that would allow more sport fishing on the spring chinook. (Limited tribal fishing now is under way above Bonneville Dam.)

But such river conditions in years past didn't cause lengthy delays.

"We're absolutely at our wits' end trying to figure out what's going on," said Bill Tweit, a Washington state Department of Fish and Wildlife biologist.

Forecasts also were off last year, when biologists predicted 254,100 fish would reach the Columbia River mouth, and the end run was estimated at 106,000 fish. Last year, that run peaked in May rather than April.

That prompted biologists to investigate what might have happened to the fish. They looked at Canadian fisheries and the take of an expanding sea lion population.

The report concluded that none of those factors could have been responsible for the shortfall and affirmed the most important influence probably was a change in ocean conditions.

Hal Bernton: 206-464-2581 or hbernton@seattletimes.com

Home

Contact

 

Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:15 AM  Pacific


Copyright klamathbasincrisis.org, 2005, All Rights Reserved