PCFFA vs Bureau of Reclamation
decision by 9th
Circuit Court Ruling October 18, 2005.
HERE for court decision.
HERE
for KWUA response 10/20/05 |
|
8
PEER-REVIEWED REASONS OF SALMON DECLINE by USFWS |
October 20, 2005
A few things seem to have been conveniently ignored regarding the
Klamath Project in the 9th Circuit Court Ruling:
*Link River often dried up before the Project was built.
*After the Project was built to store water for irrigation, those
releases raise the lake level and river flow.
*Some facts about the
author of the 'science' leading to the biological opinions
controlling management of the Klamath Project,
Dr. Thomas B. Hardy
HERE for Fish die-off
page. |
July 18, 1918
Link River Dry before the Klamath Project was built. The Project
raised water levels in the lake and river
HERE
for larger photo |
Klamath
Irrigators slammed by court with science bought and
paid for, 57 per cent of farmer's water
isn't enough; Klamath farmers are devastated by
appeals court ruling, Klamath Courier posted to KBC
10/29/05
Appeals Court
Tosses Plan to Settle Oregon Water Dispute, Fox News 11/6/05
Klamath Project back in the
crosshairs, H&N 10/21/05
Environmentalists claim victory in Klamath River water ruling, San
Francisco, Siskiyou Daily News 10/21/05
Court
tosses Bush plan for Klamath water, Oregonian 10/19/05
Water Plan for Klamath Is
Rejected, LA Times 10/19/05 |
