Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Dear Klamath Farmers,
from Jim Beers, 8/30/04
I try to read everything I can about Klamath activities and I see it as a complex problem that some neophyte like me should be careful about commenting about. However this news release about Rep. Blumenauer really caught my eye. I am unfamiliar with his past involvement in this issue and he may have some good ideas but this report fails to illuminate the reader on that aspect of his visit. Three things he was credited with in the article really deserve an answer, in my view.
"Ending agriculture on the refuges could bring more money into the Basin by bringing in more birds and, thus, more bird watchers."?? Answer: Practically every refuge I know that has a large concentration of birds has LOTS of agriculture on and/or near the refuge. Ending agriculture does not produce any more appreciable amount of birds at that place for birdwatchers and it certainly feeds LESS migratory and/or wintering birds. Further, increasing concentrations of birds is a phenomenon that should be investigated carefully for reasons of HUMAN HEALTH, BIRD HEALTH, SOIL QUALITY, SURFACE WATER QUALITY, AND UNDERGROUND WATER QUALITY. Look at the EPA regs for duck feedlots and the research behind it and you will see that domestic duck feces has streptococcus, staphylococcus, nitrates, orthophosphorus, volatile solids and other contaminants in abundant concentrations that has caused the Federal government to claim jurisdiction over every such flock OVER 5,000 birds and to require double lagoons, aerators, and stiff fines for any runoff even during storms. NO such research has been conducted on wild birds and Federal and State managers refuse to even address the issue. Finally, the assertion that "bringing in more birds" brings in "more bird watchers" is patently false. This bit of faux-folk wisdom is used everywhere to justify closing timber mills, shutting down ranches, decimating big game herds, destroying public land access roads and every sort of Federal harm to the environment and our human society. Whenever anyone comes around, especially some Federal politician murmuring about chunks of Federal money, spouting this stuff you should look him in they eye and tell him to prove it. It is always an economic absurdity and a failure of justice and common sense to say that a vanload of yuppies in the fall replaces farms, families, schools, and communities that were destroyed for their enjoyment.
"We are going to have to find a big chunk of federal money to get a solution." Answer: If the only answer to every issue like Klamath is "a big chunk of federal money" we are all doomed because Federal bureaucrats, Federal politicians, and the environmental organizations that keep stirring these pots like Klamath will see that the strings with the money will tie you up and take away any and all rights you have today.
"If Blumenauer tries to bring legislation again, lawyers will probably get involved." Answer: I am glad they told us. Anyone who can tie their own tie knows this and know what it will produce.
This article and other recent articles by Jim Beers can be found at
Page Updated: Thursday May 07, 2009 09:15 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2004, All Rights Reserved