Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
DRAFT Summary Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement
January 7,
2010
Summary and Status
Klamath
River Basin stakeholders have developed a Final Review Draft of
the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. The Agreement is
intended to result in effective and durable solutions which
will: 1) restore and sustain natural fish production and provide
for full participation in ocean and river harvest opportunities
of fish species throughout the Klamath Basin; 2) establish
reliable water and power supplies which sustain agricultural
uses, communities, and National Wildlife Refuges; and 3)
contribute to the public welfare and the sustainability of all
Klamath Basin communities.
For over
three years the Klamath Settlement Group, representing over 30
organizations has been working to develop a comprehensive
solution for the Klamath Basin. All parties agreed to public
release of the Agreement to inform the public and, where
appropriate, to enable public review before each organization in
the Group makes a final decision on whether to sign it.
The Klamath
Negotiation Group, which is comprised of most of the Klamath
Settlement Group and PacifiCorp, has also completed work on the
Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement. The Hydroelectric
Settlement establishes a process for the potential removal of
four PacifiCorp dams on the Klamath River. The Hydroelectric
Settlement is also being reviewed and each organization will
decide whether to sign the two agreements concurrently.
The
schedule calls for both agreements to be signed in February,
2010; however, organizations that need more time for review can
sign the agreement within 60 days of the original signing date.
After that date, organizations that have participated in the
settlement process and any other organization can apply to
become a party.
The Klamath
Settlement Group organizations are listed at the end of this
summary.
Scope of the Agreement
General Provisions: Part I (Sections 1 - 7) states
general provisions. These include the purpose of the Agreement,
the Parties’ obligations to support and implement, funding,
dispute resolution, coordination and oversight, and other
general provisions.
. Hydropower Agreement: Part II (Section 8) states the parties’ obligations to support the Hydroelectric Settlement.
Fisheries Program: Part III (Sections 9 - 13) describes the
Fisheries Restoration, Reintroduction, and Monitoring Program.
This will contribute to the sustainability and robust
harvestable surplus of anadromous and other fisheries throughout
the Klamath Basin.
Water
Resources Program: Part IV (Sections 14 - 20) describes the
Water Resources Program. This consists of schedules, plans, and
other provisions to change the management of delivered water
supply for irrigation and related uses in the Klamath
Reclamation Project, upper Klamath Basin, and the National
Wildlife Refuges. It also describes the Power for Water
Management Program to provide power cost security for On-Project
and Off-Project irrigators participating in the agreement and
for the National Wildlife Refuges through the use of
conservation and efficiency improvements as well as new
renewable power generation.
Regulatory Assurances: Part V (Sections 21 - 25) states the
regulatory assurances under the federal Endangered Species Act
and other laws, related to the performance of the Fisheries and
Water Resources Programs. This program provides support for the
development of habitat conservation plans and general
conservation plans.
Counties
Program: Part VII (Sections 26 – 30) describes the Counties’
Impacts Mitigation and Benefits Program. This will assure that
implementation of the Hydroelectric Settlement and the
performance of other obligations under the agreement occurs in a
manner that benefits the interests of Klamath County, Oregon;
Del Norte, Humboldt and Siskiyou Counties, California, and their
residents.
Tribal
Program: Part VIII (Sections 31 - 34) describes the Tribal
Program. This will assure that implementation of the
Hydroelectric Settlement and the performance of other
obligations under the Agreement occurs in a manner that benefits
the interests of the Karuk Tribe, Yurok Tribe, and Klamath
Tribes and their members. Key provisions of the agreement are
summarized below; for a copy of both agreements please go to the
following website:
http://www.edsheets.com/Klamathdocs.html.
Rebuilding Fisheries Goal: the goals of the Fisheries
Program are to (i) restore and maintain ecological functionality
and connectivity of historic Fish habitats; (ii) re-establish
and maintain naturally sustainable and viable populations of
Fish to the full capacity of restored habitats; and (iii)
provide for Full Participation in Harvest Opportunities for Fish
Species.
Program
Elements: The Fisheries Program: 1) provides for
reintroduction of anadromous species above the current site of
Iron Gate Dam, including tributaries to Upper Klamath Lake; 2)
establishes conditions that, combined with effective
implementation of the Water Resources Program and the
Hydroelectric Settlement will contribute to the natural
sustainability of fisheries and full participation in harvest
opportunities, as well as the overall ecosystem health of the
Klamath River Basin; 3) assesses status and trends of fish 3 and
their habitats; and 4) assesses the effectiveness of actions and
provides for adaptive management.
Approaches: The Fisheries Program will use collaboration,
incentives, and adaptive management as preferred approaches. In
the basin above Upper Klamath Lake, program planning will
involve and reflect collaboration among Upper Basin irrigators,
Tribes, and other appropriate parties. It will emphasize
strategies and actions to restore and maintain properly
functioning lake and river processes and conditions, while also
striving to maintain or enhance economic stability of adjacent
landowners. Further, it will prioritize habitat restoration and
monitoring actions to ensure the greatest return on
expenditures.
Geographic Scope: The focus of restoration and monitoring
will be the Klamath River Basin, excluding the Trinity River
watershed above its confluence with the Klamath River. The focus
of reintroduction program will be the Upper Klamath Basin. The
Agreement is not intended and will not be implemented to
establish or introduce populations of salmon, steelhead, or
Pacific lamprey in the Lost River or its tributaries, or to the
Tule Lake Basin.
Fisheries Restoration: The agreement provides a detailed
process to restore fish in the Klamath Basin. Elements include:
• Phase
I Plan: The plan will establish restoration priorities and
criteria for selecting restoration projects over the next ten
years. Specific elements will include, but may not be limited
to, restoration and permanent protection of riparian vegetation,
restoration of stream channel functions, remediation of fish
passage problems, and prevention of entrainment of fish into
diversions.
• Phase
II Plan: Within seven years of finalizing the Phase I plan,
the fish managers will develop a long-term plan based on the
monitoring results of the Phase I actions. The Phase II plan
will establish elements, restoration priorities, and an adaptive
management process for the remainder of the agreement. The fish
managers will revise the plan as appropriate.
Fish
Passage and Water Quality: The parties commit to support a
separate Hydroelectric Settlement that establishes a process for
the potential removal of Iron Gate, J.C. Boyle, Copco 1 and
Copco 2 Dams on the Klamath River. These dams block coho salmon,
Chinook salmon, steelhead, and Pacific lamprey from migrating
above Iron Gate Dam. Removal of these dams would give salmon
access to an additional 300 miles of habitat in the Klamath
River Basin. The two agreements also include measures to improve
water quality.
Fisheries Reintroduction: The agreement includes a program to reintroduce fish to the areas currently blocked by the hydroelectric dams (except the Lost River). The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission has adopted a policy to establish self-sustaining, naturallyproduced populations of Chinook, steelhead, coho, and lamprey that were historically present in the Upper Klamath Basin. • Phase I: This plan will address the near-term investigations, facilities, actions, monitoring, and decisions necessary to initiate and accomplish the reintroduction of anadromous fish species.
• Phase II: This plan will address the management of
re-established fish populations in presently un-occupied
habitats when fish have access to these areas. • Screening
Program: One objective for the reintroduction program is to
prevent reintroduced salmon and other aquatic species from
entering irrigation diversions. The Bureau of Reclamation will
evaluate appropriate methods and locations to address such
entrainment at Klamath Reclamation Project diversions,
including: Lost River diversion channel or associated diversion
points; North Canal, Ady Canal, and other diversions from
Reclamation or Reclamation contractor-owned facilities diverting
water from the Klamath River/Lake Ewauna.
Additional Water for Fish: The agreement includes a
number of actions to increase the amount of water to improve
instream flows and maintain the elevation of Upper Klamath Lake;
these measures include:
• Interim Program: The parties to the agreement will
support funding to implement a water leasing and purchase
program to reduce surface water diversions from the Klamath
River and from its tributaries above Upper Klamath Lake and to
apply the water obtained toward improving the status of
anadromous and resident fish. The Parties intend that this
program will be administered to increase, to the extent
technically feasible, the amount of water in the Klamath River
and Upper Klamath Lake toward the amounts which will result from
the permanent instream water supply enhancement actions in the
Agreement.
• Permanent Increase in Water for Fish Management: The
agreement establishes limitations on the quantity of water
diverted from Upper Klamath Lake and the Klamath River for use
in the Klamath Reclamation Project. The agreement calls for the
Klamath Water and Power Agency (KWAPA)—a joint powers entity
comprised of irrigation districts—to develop a long-term plan
which will include measures to operate within the permitted
diversion limits. The Department of the Interior and Yurok Tribe
have estimated that the limitation will result in the
availability of water for irrigation being approximately 100,000
acre feet less than current demand in the driest years, with
irrigation water availability increasing on a sliding scale with
increasingly wet conditions.
• Upper Klamath Basin Water Program: The agreement
establishes a voluntary program for water use retirement in the
Wood River, Sprague River, Sycan River (excluding the drainage
from the Sycan Marsh upstream), and the Williamson River (from
the confluence with the Sprague River upstream to Kirk) that
will be designed to secure
30,000 acre feet of water for additional inflow to Upper Klamath Lake. The program also includes a voluntary program to improve fisheries habitat and provides federal 5 regulatory assurances to landowners in these sub-basins in a manner that seeks to maintain landowner economic stability.
• Additional Water Supply, Conservation, and Storage: The
agreement includes additional obligations to enhance water
conservation and provide for further water storage. Measures to
increase water supply in Upper Klamath Lake include the
breaching of levees in the Williamson River Delta that
reconnected approximately 28,800 acre feet of storage;
reconnecting Barnes Ranch and Agency Lake Ranch to Agency Lake
to restore approximately 63,700 acre feet of storage; and
management of, and ultimate reconnection of Wood River Wetlands
to Agency Lake to provide approximately 16,000 acre feet of
storage. The parties will also support completion of the
feasibility report under the Klamath Basin Water Supply
Enhancement Act of 2000, ongoing investigations of additional
storage, and criteria for the use of water from such storage.
• Protection for Additional Water: The agreement has
provisions to ensure to the extent permitted by applicable law
that all the additional water generated by the programs will
remain in Upper Klamath Lake or the Klamath River to benefit
fish.
• Management of Environmental Water: All of the
additional water will be managed for the benefit of fisheries in
Upper Klamath Lake and the Klamath River. The agreement
establishes a Technical Advisory Team that will develop an
Annual Water Management Plan that will provide recommendations
to the Secretary of the Interior. During each water year, the
Technical Advisory Team will also recommend ongoing, real-time
operations to adjust for changing conditions.
• No Adverse Impacts from Groundwater Use: The agreement
includes provisions to ensure that groundwater use under the
plan in the Klamath Reclamation Project does not have
significant impacts on river flows important to fisheries. If
investigations by the U.S. Geological Service identify defined
adverse impacts, the agreement provides procedures to implement
a remedy. The agreement also sets up a process if further
investigations warrant other measures to respond to effects on
fisheries.
Additional Water for Wildlife Refuges: The agreement
provides specific allocations and delivery obligations for water
for the Lower Klamath and Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuges.
It also increases the water availability and reliability above
historical levels.
Drought Plan: The Klamath Tribes, Karuk Tribe and Yurok
Tribe, Upper Klamath Water Users Association, the Klamath Water
and Power Agency, a representative of conservation and fishing
groups, the Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges, Oregon
Water Resources Department and California Department of Fish and
Game will develop a Drought Plan. This Plan will include a
process to ensure increasingly intensive water management for
agricultural, National Wildlife Refuges, and in-lake and
in-river fishery purposes in drought years, and in preparation
for the potential of an extreme drought to avoid or minimize
adverse impacts to Klamath Basin communities and natural
resources in response to drought conditions of increasing
severity.
Climate Change: The parties will determine how long-term
climate change may affect the fisheries and communities of the
Klamath Basin. The parties will re-convene to negotiate in good
faith any supplemental terms to the agreement which may be
necessary to address changes in the climate in order to achieve
the parties’ goal of maintaining sustainable fisheries and
communities.
Monitoring: The fish managers will develop a fish
monitoring plan that will assess the status and trends of fish
populations and their habitats; this effort will also evaluate
factors that are limiting the restoration of fish populations.
It will provide information for the restoration actions and the
management of fisheries. The Monitoring Plan will collect data
on instream flows and Upper Klamath Lake elevations to evaluate
the outcomes of the Water Resources Program. This information
will also be used by the Technical Advisory Team in developing
the Annual Water Management Plan. The Monitoring Plan will also
assess the effectiveness of the restoration actions. This
information will be used to determine restoration priorities and
other adaptive management actions.
Implementation: The agreement establishes an annual
process to determine funding needs, funding availability, set
priorities for the Fisheries Program and engage with the public.
The fish managers will also prepare annual reports on all
activities that were implemented.
Sustainable Communities Water Supply Reliability: The
agreement contains a number of measures to provide water supply
reliability:
• On-Project Plan: The parties have agreed to a permanent
limitation on the amount of water that will be diverted from
Upper Klamath Lake and the Klamath River for the Klamath
Reclamation Project. KWAPA will have the sole responsibility to
develop and implement the On-Project Plan. The plan will align
irrigation water supply and demand for the project consistent
with the diversion limits. KWAPA will evaluate the following
measures to meet the purpose of the plan: conservation
easements, forbearance agreements, conjunctive use programs,
efficiency measures, land acquisitions, water acquisitions,
groundwater development, groundwater substitution, other
voluntary transactions, water storage, and any other applicable
measures.
• Funding: The parties will support the funding estimates
for the plan that are in the agreement. Reclamation will
consider whether funds made available for the interim flow and
lake level program that are not expended in a year should be
made available to accelerate the implementation of the
On-Project Plan.
Additional On-Project Water: The agreement would increase the allocation of water to the Klamath Reclamation Project in some years by 10,000 acre feet if the four PacifiCorp dams are removed or additional storage is available. The Klamath Basin Coordinating Council could also provide this increase after February 2020 after receipt of recommendations from the Technical Advisory Team.
• Change in Authorized Purposes of the Klamath Reclamation
Project: The agreement would provide support for federal
legislation which would add fish and wildlife and national
wildlife refuges as authorized purposes of the Klamath
Reclamation Project, with terms to protect the existing
agricultural uses in a manner consistent with the agreement. The
change will facilitate the ability to provide reliable water
supplies to the National Wildlife Refuges.
• On-Project Water Rights Assurances: The agreement
includes provisions to provide water rights assurances related
to water diversions from the Klamath Tribes, Karuk Tribe, and
Yurok Tribe, and the United States as a trustee of the tribes to
the Klamath Reclamation Project and, includes resolution of
certain contests in the Klamath Basin Adjudication.
• Drought Plan: The agreement identifies a number of
strategies that would be used to deal with extreme drought
conditions including voluntary water conservation measures,
additional stored water, leasing water on a willing-seller
basis, the use of groundwater (for irrigation purposes or to
replace water that would otherwise be diverted), and reduction
of water diversions by exercise of water rights priorities.
Water diversions to the Klamath Reclamation Project could only
be limited in an Extreme Drought (e.g. 1992 or 1994) and if
these other measures were not sufficient.
• Off-Project Water Settlement: The agreement establishes
a process to develop an Off- Project Water Settlement (OPWAS) to
1) resolve claims between Off-Project Irrigators, the Klamath
Tribes, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs in the Klamath Basin
Adjudication in Cases 277, 279, 280, 281, 282, 284, 285 and 286;
2) or provide reciprocal assurances for maintenance of instream
flows and reliable irrigation water deliveries, notwithstanding
the outcome of any unresolved contests; and 3) provide for a
voluntary Water Use Retirement Program. This program will be
designed to maintain the economic character of the off-project
agricultural community and to not adversely impact the water
rights of any remaining contestants who are not signatories to
the OPWAS.
• Off-Project Reliance Program: The agreement establishes
a program consistent with the water use retirement program. The
program funds will be used to avoid or mitigate the immediate
effects of unexpected circumstances that could affect the amount
of water available for irrigation in the Off-Project area.
Keno and Link River Dams: The parties will support
provisions in the Hydroelectric Settlement to transfer Keno Dam
to the Bureau of Reclamation. Keno and Link River
8 dams would continue to provide water to the Klamath Reclamation Project recognizing authorities and obligations of federal agencies.
Maintain Lease Land Farming: Parties support continued
lease land farming on Lower Klamath and Tule Lake National
Wildlife Refuge that uses practices that enhance waterfowl
management while optimizing agricultural use and maximizing
lease revenues.
Maintain Walking Wetlands and Other Wildlife and Agriculture
Partnerships:
The agreement would continue a refuge-approved program that
incorporates managed wetlands into agricultural crop rotations
on the Wildlife Refuge as well as on private lands in the
Klamath Reclamation Project. Such wetlands support the diversity
of waterfowl species endemic to the Upper Klamath Basin. Walking
wetlands that are returned to agricultural production enhance
agricultural crop yields and reduce or eliminate the need for
chemical inputs by enhancing soil fertility and reducing soil
pests and diseases to crops.
Consistency with State Water Law: The agreement would not
limit the authority of the Oregon Water Resources Department to
administer existing water rights or determine water rights in
the ongoing Klamath Basin Water Rights Adjudication. The
agreement also will not affect the California Water Resources
Control Board's regulatory authority.
Regulatory Assurances: The parties commit to take every
reasonable and legallypermissible step to avoid or minimize any
adverse impact, in the form of new regulation or other legal or
funding obligation that might occur to users of water or land
upstream of Iron Gate Dam from introduction or reintroduction of
aquatic species to currently unoccupied habitats or areas.
• Unforeseen Circumstances: If unforeseen circumstances
result from reintroduction during the course of the agreement,
the parties will meet and confer to determine any necessary
future actions, including, but not limited to, consideration of
whether narrowly tailored regulations or legislation is
necessary to minimize any impacts.
• Endangered Species Act: The agreement establishes steps
designed to comply with the Endangered Species Act, including
the preparation of biological opinions on specific federal
actions called for in the agreement. The agreement also
establishes a process to develop a General Conservation Plan(s)
or Habitat Conservation Plans that would be designed to assist
non-federal parties to comply with the ESA. Participation in
these plans would be voluntary.
• Regulatory processes: Before seeking any further
limitations on diversion, use and reuse of water related to the
Klamath Reclamation Project beyond the limitations in the
agreement, NMFS and FWS will consider, to the maximum extent
consistent with the ESA and any other applicable law, whether
increased water supply in Upper Klamath Lake and all other
relevant obligations for the protection of the affected
resources have been implemented. NMFS and FWS will also consider
whether there are any alternatives, including additional habitat
restoration actions or alternative sources of water. If other
parties believe that listed species are in jeopardy of
extinction, the
9 agreement also describes the steps that the parties would take to ensure timely implementation of the measures in the agreement, explore other alternatives, and pursue dispute resolution before a party would initiate litigation that could limit the diversions.
Power Program: The purpose of the power program is to
ensure affordable electricity for eligible On-Project and
Off-Project irrigators to maintain sustainable agricultural
communities. The program includes a number of actions that are
designed to achieve a delivered power cost target level at or
below the average cost of similarly situated Reclamation
irrigation and drainage projects in the surrounding area. The
program includes an interim power program, access to federal
power, and a long-term program to implement energy efficiency
and new renewable resource generation. The program also delivers
affordable power for moving water to the National Wildlife
Refuges and the return of water to the Klamath River as part of
the implementation of the On-Project plan.
Counties Program: This program includes programs to
address specific economic impacts associated with implementation
of the Hydroelectric Settlement, including programs to offset
potential property tax losses in Klamath and Siskiyou Counties.
Tribal Program: The parties support the goals of each
tribe to achieve the revitalization of tribal subsistence and
related economies. The parties support the Tribes as they strive
to meet a reasonable standard of living, a standard recognized
in the reservation of tribal fishing and other related rights,
until the fisheries are restored to a level that allows full
participation in harvest opportunities. Under the agreement, the
parties will support funding to assist the Tribes in developing
the capacity to participate as grantees and in the collaborative
management of the Fisheries Program. The parties acknowledge
that the agreement addresses primarily tribal fishing and water
matters, and accordingly agree that they will also support
efforts by the Tribes to secure economic revitalization programs
and funds such that the Tribes may achieve long-term economic
self-sufficiency. Funding will be provided to each Tribe for the
development and planning of long-term economic revitalization
projects. The parties also support funding for the Mazama Forest
Project in Klamath County, Oregon.
Implementation and Funding A key feature is a commitment
by the parties to cooperate fully in its implementation. The
agreement requires each party to implement each of its
obligations under the agreement in good faith and with due
diligence.
Coordination and Oversight: The agreement establishes the
Klamath Basin Coordinating Council to facilitate coordination,
cooperation, collaboration, and accountability by the parties to
ensure that elements of the Klamath River Basin Restoration
Agreement are carried out effectively. The KBCC will provide for
general implementation oversight, including activity and program
coordination, information sharing, priority setting, fund
seeking, and dispute resolution related to implementation of the
agreement. It will also serve as the primary forum for public
involvement. The agreement also establishes the Klamath Basin
Advisory Council to advise Federal agencies in the
implementation of the agreement, consistent with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
Dispute Resolution: The agreement establishes a process
to resolve issues among the parties. The process includes four
steps:
1) clear notice of a dispute;
2) informal meetings to resolve the dispute;
3) referral of the dispute to the Klamath Basin Coordinating
Council; and
4) mediation. The agreement also includes enforcement provisions
and a party may take actions to enforce any contractual
obligation under the agreement after complying with the dispute
resolution procedures. The parties acknowledge that resorting to
litigation will be a last resort, made only after careful
consideration of the potential collateral consequences for the
agreement.
Funding: The parties have developed estimates for the
costs of implementing the agreement and will support
authorization and appropriation of funds from federal and state
governments. The Klamath Settlement Group estimates that the
cost of implementing the agreement in its first year would be
approximately $32 million. The long-term cost of the habitat,
water programs, and other measures in the Basin Restoration
Agreement would be about $96 million dollars per year. Of the
total, over 90 percent is budgeted for fisheries restoration and
reintroduction and actions to enhance the amount of water for
fish.
Organizations in the Klamath Settlement Group
United States
The United States Forest Service
National Marine Fisheries Service
United States Department of the Interior,
including Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Bureau of Land Management,
Bureau of Reclamation,
and Fish and Wildlife Service
State of California
California Department of Fish and Game
California Natural Resources Agency
State of Oregon Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
Oregon Water Resources Department
Tribes
Karuk Tribe
Klamath Tribes
Yurok Tribe Counties
Del Norte County,
California Humboldt County,
California Klamath County, Oregon
Siskiyou County,
California Parties Related to Klamath Reclamation Project Ady
District Improvement Company Collins Products, LLC Enterprise
Irrigation District Don Johnston & Son Inter-County Properties
Co, which acquired title as Inter-County Title Company Klamath
Irrigation District Klamath Drainage District Klamath Basin
Improvement District Klamath Water Users Association Klamath
Water and Power Agency Bradley S. Luscombe Malin Irrigation
District Midland District Improvement Company Modoc Lumber
Company Pine Grove Irrigation District Pioneer District
Improvement Company Plevna District Improvement Company Poe
Valley Improvement District Reames Golf and Country Club Shasta
View Irrigation District Sunnyside Irrigation District Tulelake
Irrigation District Van Brimmer Ditch Company Randolph and Jane
Walthall 1995 Trust Westside Improvement District #4 Winema
Hunting Lodge, Inc.
Upper Klamath Irrigators
Off-Project Water Users Association
Upper Klamath Water Users Association
Non-Governmental Organizations
American Rivers
California Trout
Friends of the River
Institute for Fisheries Resources
National Center for Conservation Science and Policy
Northern California/Nevada Council Federation of Fly Fishers
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations
Salmon River Restoration Council
Trout Unlimited
----------
Forwarded message ----------
From: Ed Sheets <ed@edsheets.com> Date: Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:57 PM Subject: KBRA Summary To: dale.morris@bia.gov, hseemann@co.humboldt.ca.us, klamathfish@hotmail.com, Laurie_Lee_Jenkins@nps.gov, mstopher@dfg.ca.gov, abaggett@waterboards.ca.gov, alan.r.dale@state.or.us, Alexandra Borack <alexandra@friendsoftheriver.org>, Alexandra_Pitts@fws.gov, Alison Koppe <AKoppe@n-h-i.org>, Allie Hostler <ahostler@hoopa-nsn.gov>, Angela Keister <Angela_Keister@fws.gov>, Anne Henigan <Anne.henigan@resources.ca.gov>, Annie Manji <AManji@dfg.ca.gov>, BARBARA.SCOTT-BRIER@sol.doi.gov, Becky Hyde <yainix@mac.com>, belinda@kwua.org, Beorn Zepp <bzepp@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, Bob Laidlaw DOI <Robert_M_Laidlaw@ios.doi.gov>, brian@nccsp.org, Bud Ullman <bullman3@earthlink.net>, "Burkholder, Kurt" <kurt.burkholder@doj.state.or.us>, caknight@jps.net, Carol_Benkosky@blm.gov, CARRIER Michael * GOV OFC <Michael.Carrier@state.or.us>, Carter_L_Brown@ios.doi.gov, "Catlett, Kelly" <kelly@friendsoftheriver.org>, Chris Stine <Chris.Stine@state.or.us>, Christine Karas <CKARAS@usbr.gov>, Chuck Bonham <CBonham@tu.org>, cnota@fs.fed.us, Craig Tucker <ctucker@karuk.us>, Darla_Eastman@fws.gov, Dave Gore <dgore@usbr.gov>, Dave Hillemeier <dhillemeier@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, David Diamond <david_diamond@fws.gov>, David Gensaw <dgensaw@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, David Harder <David.Harder@usdoj.gov>, dheinrich@waterboards.ca.gov, Doug Tedrick-Home <dougtedrick@gmail.com>, doug.tedrick@bia.gov, Ed Sheets <ed@edsheets.com>, FISH1IFR@aol.com, George Kautsky <hupafish@hoopa-nsn.gov>, Greg Addington <greg@kwua.org>, Greg Corbin <GDCORBIN@stoel.com>, guyphil@ix.netcom.com, hotroot2@cot.net, "Howerton, B" <BJ.Howerton@bia.gov>, "Hytrek, Dan" <Dan.Hytrek@noaa.gov>, Irion Sanger <ias@dvclaw.com>, Irma Lagomarsino <Irma.Lagomarsino@noaa.gov>, Jeff Mitchell <mohiswaqs@aol.com>, Jesse Ratcliffe <Jesse.d.ratcliffe@state.or.us>, Jill Duffy <Jill.Duffy@co.humboldt.ca.us>, Jill/Walt Duffy <jkduffy65@gmail.com>, Jim Milbury <Jim.Milbury@noaa.gov>, jim.lecky@noaa.gov, Joe Membrino <JMembrino@hallestill.com>, John Bezdek <John_Bezdek@ios.doi.gov>, John Corbett <JohnC@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, John Elliott <jwelliott@co.klamath.or.us>, Jon Hicks <jhicks@usbr.gov>, Juliet Virtue <JVirtue@dfg.ca.gov>, Karen Shimamoto <kshimamoto@fs.fed.us>, Karl Wirkus <kwirkus@usbr.gov>, karlscronce@charter.net, Kathryn.Kempton@noaa.gov, Ken McDermond <Kenneth_McDermond@fws.gov>, kirk.miller@resources.ca.gov, Larry Dunsmoor <LKDunsmoor@aol.com>, Leaf Hillman <leafhillman@karuk.us>, Leonard Masten <leonardmasten@hotmail.com>, Loretti Vanzetti <lvanzetti@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, Marc Van Camp <vancamp@mbkengineers.com>, Marcia Armstrong <armstrng@sisqtel.net>, Mark Rockwell <summerhillfarmpv@aol.com>, mary.s.grainey@wrd.state.or.us, Matt Bogoshian <mbogoshian@calepa.ca.gov>, "Melinda J. Davison" <MJD@dvclaw.com>, mhampton@dfg.ca.gov, Mike Belchik <mbelchik@yuroktribe.nsn.us>, Mike Dammarell <Michael.Dammarell@bia.gov>, Mike Orcutt <director@hoopa-nsn.gov>, nmurray@dfg.ca.gov, Pablo Arroyave <Parroyave@usbr.gov>, Paul Simmons <psimmons@somachlaw.com>, phillip_detrich@fws.gov, ptb92day@gmail.com, Ren Lohoefener <Ren_Lohoefener@fws.gov>, Renee Snyder <RDSnyder@blm.gov>, Richard Roos-Collins <rrcollins@n-h-i.org>, Rita Haas <rhaas@co.siskiyou.ca.us>, RKANZ@waterboards.ca.gov, Robert Franklin <fishwater@hoopa-nsn.gov>, Roy Arwood <rarwood@karuk.us>, Ruben Ochoa <ochoare@wrd.state.or.us>, Sam Walton <samrw@hughes.net>, Scott Williams <swilliams@abwwlaw.com>, SCOTT.BERGSTROM@sol.doi.gov, "Stacey, Gary" <GStacey@dfg.ca.gov>, Stacy Stoller <Stacy.Stoller@usdoj.gov>, Steve and Nancy Kandra <snkandra@fireserve.net>, Steve Macfarlane <Stephen.Macfarlane@usdoj.gov>, Steve Rothert <srothert@americanrivers.org>, steve.edmondson@noaa.gov, STurek@dfg.ca.gov, Sue Fry <sfry@usbr.gov>, suzanne.knapp@state.or.us, "Thane D. Somerville" <t.somerville@msaj.com>, "Thomas P. Guarino" <tguarino@co.siskiyou.ca.us>, thoward@waterboards.ca.gov, Tom Mallams <tmbrokenboxranch@gmail.com>, Tom Schlosser <t.schlosser@msaj.com>, Troy Fletcher <troy_fletcher@earthlink.net>, Will Hatcher <will.hatcher@klamathtribes.com>
I have attached the summary
for the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement. |
Page Updated: Thursday January 07, 2010 11:05 PM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2009, All Rights Reserved