
Our Klamath Basin
Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
|
"There are 65,000 gray wolves in North America...cattle make up the majority of the diet of wolves in California."
I attended a community
meeting on wolves last night
presented by California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife. It was the most
frustrating, discouraging
meeting I think I have ever
attended. I went into the
meeting feeling optimistic
and hopeful (that's my
default) but I left with a
sense of doom and dread. The
best way I know to describe
it is, "We are all just
screwed." Following are some
highlights of the meeting.
(Lowlights may be more
appropriate.)
1) It's our fault, whether
residents in town or
ranchers, for any conflict
we have with the wolves. If
you are in town, it's
because you are feeding the
deer. (This is not actually
occurring.) If you are a
rancher, you have bone piles
to attract the wolves (never
mind that they are killing
newborn calves far from bone
piles and that California,
in its infinite tyrannical
wisdom doesn't allow
composting of dead
livestock). You also are not
doing enough to haze the
wolves. It doesn't matter
than you are watching your
cattle 24 hours a day or
chasing them to the
neighbor's on a four
wheeler. You should be using
scare boxes: AKA big
jack-in-a-boxes that pop out
and scare the wolves if they
get too close. I am dead
serious. Oh, and pyrotechnic
guns that shoot flames and
make a load noise. I'm sure
that will go over real well
in the woods during fire
season. We can't buy or use
fireworks in California due
to wildfire risk. Are
pyrotechnic guns even legal?
And you should be using
fladry (red ribbons tied on
a fence wire) and fox lights
(lights that flash at random
times). CDFW readily admits
that these things only work
for a couple months at best
until the wolves get used to
them. After that? You're
just out of luck I guess.
2) As outlined in the
California Wolf Recovery
Plan, once there were eight
breeding pairs of wolves, we
entered Phase 2. Phase 2
allows for the use of
nonlethal projectiles to
haze wolves. Except it
really doesn't, We cannot
actually shoot wolves with
rubber bullets or beanbags
because it might kill one.
It doesn't matter if they
are actively killing a calf.
Or you dog for that matter.
And the weapons only have a
range of 40-75 feet. So what
does Phase 2 really do? It
lets CDFW TALK about
shooting wolves with
nonlethal projectiles.
3) Speaking of shooting
wolves, there is $100,000
fine and jail time for
killing a wolf. The ONLY
time you can shoot one is if
it is posing an immediate
threat to human life. Just
know, if you shoot one, you
are considered guilty until
proven innocent. These were
the exact words of the CDFW
Law Enforcement Officer.
They do not have to prove
that you are guilty. YOU
have to prove that you shot
the wolf in self defense.
How exactly does one go
about proving a wolf was
about to attack? I guess we
all better start wearing
body cams anytime we step
out our front doors
considering these wolves
have killed deer in fenced
backyards and elk right on
the doorstep of a home.
4) Back to the phases. Phase
2 was entered when there
were eight breeding pairs of
wolves for two consecutive
years. We will enter Phase
3, which may allow lethal
removal of problem wolves
when there are ? breeding
pairs of wolves for two
consecutive years. No, that
isn't a typo. It was
literally a question mark on
their slide. They have no
idea how many wolves it will
take before they remove them
from the Endangered Species
List in California. There is
NO target number in their
Wolf Recovery Plan. Which
means they can carry on
business as usual
INDEFINITELY.
5) The deer herd in our
region is declining. Of
course this has nothing to
do with wolves or other
predators. It's because they
are getting hit by cars and
drought. (We have not been
in a drought the last two
years.) CDFW has not
actually counted the deer
population since 2018. The
best data they have to
estimate rise or fall in the
deer population are filled
dear tags. Prior to 2023
over 30 tags a year were
filled. Filled tags have
declined rapidly as wolf
numbers have increased. Last
year it was just 16,
indicating a sharply
declining deer population.
6) Both UC Davis and CDFW's
own data has shown that
cattle make up the majority
of the diet of wolves in
California. CDFW does not
deny this. When asked if
they are considering the
availability of natural prey
(deer and elk) to arrive at
their elusive Phase 3
recovered number, no one had
an answer. Not the
biologist. Not the Regional
Manager. Not her supervisor.
It was, "I don't know if
they are considering prey
base." In other words, the
powers that be are COUNTING
on ranchers to grow this
wolf population on their
cattle.
7) When pressed to say when
the wolves would be removed
from the Endangered Species
List, the answer was when
they are no longer at risk
of extinction. There are
65,000 gray wolves in North
America. That fact
apparently is completely
irrelevant in determining
the status of gray wolves in
California. They are
endangered in California no
matter how many there are in
the rest of the world. And
of course, we don't know how
many there has to be before
they are no longer at risk
of extinction.
That's the gist of it all.
There is no light at the end
of the tunnel. There is no
silver lining. Our mountain
paradise has become our
daily nightmare and there is
nothing that we can do about
it.
==================================================== In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml |
Page Updated: Thursday June 12, 2025 12:03 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2023, All Rights Reserved