Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis
Upholding rural Americans' rights to grow food,
own property, and caretake our wildlife and natural resources.
Klamath bird crisis just one more avoidable tragedy if we pass water-sharing agreements
By Martin Goebel, Oregonian OpEd April 16, 2012. Martin Goebel is the president of Sustainable Northwest in Portland.
The recent front-page Oregonian story about 10,000-plus birds dying of cholera reports a tragedy exacerbated by lack of water on important wetlands in the Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge Complex ("Klamath water wars claim 10,000 birds," April 6). The story is even more tragic because this is yet another Klamath crisis that could be prevented. After the total shutoff of water to the Klamath Project farmers in 2001, the death of tens of thousands of salmon in 2002 and the nonexistent commercial salmon fishing season in 2006, the 2010 Klamath agreements were designed to prevent rotating water crises.
The broken water allocation system in the basin currently pits diverse water interests -- whether tribal people, farmers and ranchers, commercial fishermen or conservation groups -- against each other almost every year. What's notable about the Klamath agreements is that improvements for one interest -- say the refuges -- don't come from a "zero-sum game" system that fixes one problem by creating another. If implemented, the agreements would provide more annual water certainty to Klamath farmers and refuges, and better water management for both endangered salmon and sucker.
It is frustrating to witness yet another crisis when locally designed, comprehensive solutions like the agreements are ready to be implemented. Over many years of hard work, thorough analysis and tough compromises, an unprecedented group of water users found common ground and did the hard work to develop new water allocation methods that allow all stakeholders to benefit.
The crisis on the refuges is not over: More bird migrations happen in the summer and fall. Tourism will drop, and along with it, the millions of dollars that come from visitation focused on fish and wildlife. Klamath Project farmers will also face problems this year. Until the rains picked up, it looked like there would again be bankruptcies and longer lines at the local food bank. And as we write, it looks like irrigation deliveries will be about 20 percent less than normal, continuing a cycle of economic blows to a rural community that already faces significant economic challenges.
When the Lower Klamath wildlife refuges were created under President Theodore Roosevelt, the vision was that agriculture and birds should co-exist. The Klamath agreements take on that responsibility with comprehensive water-sharing solutions.
We must recognize and support the courageous leadership demonstrated by the local Klamath Basin people who have put aside their differences and worked for years to arrive at balanced fixes, guided by an interest in sustaining all of the Basin's diverse and valuable communities, including birds and fish. Their achievements have earned widespread support, from editorial boards across Oregon, California and the nation to a broad diversity of local, regional and national conservation groups. Now we need help from Congress -- and especially the leadership of Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Greg Walden -- to help us move Klamath legislation and ensure that these crises don't happen -- predictably -- next year.
Martin Goebel is the president of Sustainable Northwest in Portland.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Page Updated: Tuesday April 17, 2012 01:16 AM Pacific
Copyright © klamathbasincrisis.org, 2001 - 2012, All Rights Reserved